Monday, February 7, 2011

What do "they say"?

It is never easy for everyone to fully understand and agree on a subject matter, especially when it is an important and rather serious matter. When it comes to the death penalty, there are many different views and beliefs. Organ donation is a technology that has become very helpful and widely used in order to save lives. When it comes to conversing about the subject, there is no question about whether or not it should be legal. Everyone is so appreciative and accepting to having organs donated and even placed inside their body to save a life or their bodies. So why should this be any different for an inmate on death row?

When it comes to the argument of whether or not death row inmates should be aloud to donate their organs, the subject turns completely controversial, when normally the subject is without question beneficial and accepted. There are many different viewpoints and beliefs when it comes to the subject and everyone's story is different. In the article above this post, there are many different view points and stories relating to why the subject matter should be accepted or not. Some argue that organ donation is extremely expensive, so why waste it on an inmate. Whereas others argue the other side that is why should society let a perfectly good organ go to waste, when it can easily save a person's life.

One viewpoint that I strongly disagree with is the governments. The government has not firmly decided whether or not organ donation should be accepted. They allow some cases to accept an organ donation, such as a family member, but they do not allow other cases to accept a donation. The way the laws are set up when regulating donations is confusing and not accurate or totally fair.

All and all, there are many different viewpoints on the subject matter, and the law for the death row inmates donations needs to be firmly established

No comments:

Post a Comment